patching...
Update: Get Patch delivered daily to your in-box. Sign up now for the newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Military Lifts Women in Combat Ban

Do you agree with the Department of Defense's decision to allow women to fight on the front lines?

 

Department of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is expected to announce today the lifting of a 19-year ban that prevented women from serving on the frontlines of ground combat, CNN reports.

The overturning of the 1994 ban would allow women to serve in special operations services such as the Navy SEALS or the Army's Delta Force and open more than 230,000 jobs to women in the military, the Associated Press reported on Wednesday.

The move, made at the recommendation of the Joints Chief of Staff, will phase in the jobs over the next few years, allowing units to assess the qualifications for women to join their ranks and request exemptions from the order. Panetta expects all branches to have women integrated as much as possible by January 2016, according to CNN.

Do you think this move by the Pentagon is a good idea? Is this a sign that the military is making positive progress, or will the physical demands of the frontline put the soldiers in danger? Cast your vote in the poll and sound off in the comments.

  • Should women be allowed to serve on the field of combat?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        8 (53%)
    • No
        7 (46%)
    • Not sure
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 15
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Department of Defense, Military, Women in Combat, and pentagon

concerned citizen

12:42 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I agree to let women be on frontlines in war. If you noticed who is usually in the frontlines at home? It is the woman. Women are fully capable of doing anything they want to and are usually smarter then men. How about asking just the women if they want to go to war and be on the frontlines. A mans oppinion shouldnt count in this situation. I support it and if we have more capable people to fight for us then there is no problem with it at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Military Wife

3:54 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

I do not know how you can compare being on the frontlines in war to the frontlines at home! I am a military wife that finds this statement to be appalling. I have been “the frontlines” at home and still cannot compare my nice cozy surroundings to those of the frontlines in war.

Mike Shortall

2:30 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I have no problem with this, if for no other reason than the absence of combat experience probably holds some well-qualified women from deserving posts of higher rank.

I just hope that we are prepared for the day - and it has already happened during the Iraq War - when a woman combatant is captured, tortured, assaulted, etc. Because in those situations you can only do so much to attempt rescue. The first time that happens will be extremely traumatic for some people, especially family members.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue

2:48 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I have to say, as a family member, even a man combatant being captured, tortured, assaulted, etc. is a pretty traumatic nightmare.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

5:19 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Absolutely, Sue ... But IMO the emotional reaction to a woman being taken and treated in horrible ways would probably elicit a different level of emotional response in a lot of people.

Pete Palestina

3:41 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

On one hand, if a woman wants to join the military and passes the rigors of combat training she should be entitled to be in combat just as the guys are. The rules or standards should not be lowered to accommodate them however. On the other hand, I can see the problems that could arise in combat areas when a man may feel too protective over the woman and lose track of the mission at hand. We cannot have distractions that put everyone in danger.

Reply

Dunacn

3:58 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Two Question:
1. Is the PT test now going to be equal for both male and female? as it is currently administered, females have a modified test.
2. If equality on the battlefield is what this is about, will females now be required to register for Selective Service?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

5:20 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Great questions ... especially the one on the draft!

Jane

6:28 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I hear a profound silence from my so-called feminist sisters on this - my guess is we'll see a protest and excuses when it comes time to applying "equality" to registration for selective service.

Reply

Gerry Couch

11:50 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

I am a combat veteran, for those in favor of this have you known or talked to someone who has seen combat? Have you ever seen any wounded soldiers or a soldier on fire, and you had to put him out? Can women pick up a wounded comrade and throw him over their shoulder and carry him to a medivac? There are soldiers out there who would put their life at risk because they will be worried about the women next to them. I know that there are probably one in hundred women that could physically do the job. Today we have a all volunteer Military, how are you going to feel if the draft were reinstated and your daughters and grandaughters were inscripted into the infantry. Or worse yet taken prisoner? Be careful what you wish for women!!!!!!

Reply

Leave a comment